DynaClip Delta™

Dynaclip Delta™ - in bone
Dynaclip Delta
Dynaclip Delta™ - in bone
Dynaclip Delta

DynaClip Delta™

Precision Fixation for 1st MTP Fusion

Specifically designed for 1st MTP fusion, the DynaClip Delta™ demonstrates exceptional biomechanical performance. Its unique four-leg, triangular configuration offers enhanced compression and rotational stability, making it the preferred choice for robust NiTiNOL staples in 1st MTP fusion procedures.

1st MTP Fusion Staple
  • Overview
  • Videos
  • Part Numbers
  • Related Products
  • Documents
  • References
The DynaClip Delta™’s unique 4-leg, triangular configuration offers enhanced compression and rotational stability, rendering it the optimal selection for robust NiTiNOL staples in 1st MTP fusion procedures.

Features & Benefits

Enhanced Durability: DynaClip Delta™'s design places stress across the bridge, away from the legs, improving resistance to failure post-surgery.

Maximized Compression: The increased bridge curvature enables compression to be generated through the bridge, not just the legs.

Low-Profile: The tapered, low-profile bridge is designed to reduce prominence and minimize patient irritation.

 

Design Rationale

Competitor four-legged bone staples rely solely on leg recovery for compression due to their flat bridge design. Their narrow legs create stress at weak points, increasing the risk of implant failure under weight-bearing, with studies showing breakage in up to 11% of patients.1

In contrast, the DynaClip Delta™ showed four times less permanent plantar gapping than a plate with a crossing screw construct.2

 

Finite Element Analysis of Bending Stresses

Analysis of Bending Stresses

6323609534112

DynaClip Delta™ and DynaClip Quattro™ Animation

Ordering Information

PART # DESCRIPTION
3000-10-24161412 DYNACLIP DELTA, 24 MM X 16 MM X 14 MM X 12MM
3000-10-28161412 DYNACLIP DELTA, 28 MM X 16 MM X 14 MM X 12MM
  1. 1 Schipper ON, Ford SE, Moody PW, Doren BV, Ellington JK. Radiographic Results of Nitinol Compression Staples for Hindfoot and Midfoot Arthrodeses. Foot & Ankle International, 2018; 39(2): 172-179.
  2. Gonzalez T, Jackson JB, King S, Gregory K, Johnson J, Kline C, Safranski D. Biomechanical Performance of Static Compression Devices Compared to NiTiNOL Compression Devices in Simulated First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2023 Dec 22;8(4):2473011423S00027. doi: 10.1177/2473011423S00027. PMCID: PMC10748674