DynaNail TTC

The DynaNail® Difference

#NailItTheFirstTime

Explore the difference in the innovative DynaNail TTC Fusion System, engineered to redefine TTC fusion constructs. Backed by robust clinical evidence, this dynamic system provides superior fusion rates1,2 and faster recoveries3. With DynaNail® TTC, your patients can rely on a solution that has over a decade of clinical success and 40+ published studies behind it.

 Learn More  Contact Us 

94%

Overall fusion rate of Dynanail® vs. 65% in competitive
static nails1,2

40+

Pieces of published & peer-reviewed data around Dynanail®

36%

Faster time to fusion with DynaNail® vs. Competitive Nails3

1/2
“The DynaNail® is an unrivaled orthopedic device and my implant of choice for hindfoot arthrodesis. No other hindfoot fusion device allows for intra-operative compression and accounts for post-operative bone resorption by maintaining active compression. It’s amazing to ‘see’ the DynaNail at work!”
Dr. Samuel Adams, MD (Durham, NC)
2/2
“After nearly 12 years of experience using DynaNail, I can literally say that we have been able to heal and save many limbs that have been deemed unsalvageable with the active, adaptive healing that is present with the sustained dynamic compression of the NiTiNOL element. The device is able to reach Clinical Osteogenic/Osteoinductive compressive loads in fusion sites without creating compression necrosis or stress shielding the bone. The clinical data supports this device for all my fusions and especially the difficult salvage cases.”
– Dr. Douglas Pacaccio, Design Surgeon (Sycamore, IL)

Curious about discovering the capabilities of DynaNail TTC? Reach out to us!

 

Stay connected with us on Instagram and LinkedIn

#NailItTheFirstTime

 
faa-insta-01.jpg
faa-insta-04.jpg
faa-insta-05.jpg
faa-insta-06.jpg
faa-insta-07.jpg
    References:
  1. Chundi G, Dawar A, Ahn DB, et al. Use of Sustained Compression to Mitigate Nonunion in Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis: A Propensity Score-Matched Nationwide Readmissions Database Analysis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2025. doi:10.5435/JAAOS-D- 25-00011.
  2. Griffin MJ, Coughlin MJ. Evaluation of Midterm Results of the Panta Nail: An Active Compression Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis Device. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 57,1 (2018): 74-80. doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2017.08.010.
  3. Steele JR, Kildow BJ, Cunningham DJ, Dekker TJ, DeOrio JK, Easley ME, Nunley JA, Parekh SG, Adams SB. Comparison of Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodeses Using Sustained Dynamic Compression Nail Versus Nondynamized Nails. Foot Ankle Spec, 2020; (13)3: 193-200.

MK-10551 Rev A